Re: reminding: there is a lot of risk in a variety of buying.
[expert reminds] from the point of view, this way really can avoid the purchase of the purchase, the buyer and the seller signed a formal property transaction contract, and can also be notarized, but because it does not meet the limit of the purchase conditions temporarily not, until the buyer has enough social insurance or tax certificate years, in line with the limit of purchase. After the conditions, to handle the matter of transfer, of course, can also wait until the policy changes, everything seems reasonable, but the contract to the transfer of the time is too long, too many variables.
transfer after signing the contract has great potential risks. First of all, because there is no transfer, although the contract is effective, but it is not able to fully guarantee that the property is the owner of the house, and it is unavoidable that the owner of "one house two selling" phenomenon. Secondly, it is difficult to guarantee that policies will not change in recent years, and what changes are hard to predict. If the contract is not transferred, the rights and property security of the buyers can not be guaranteed. Finally, the change of house prices may cause the contract to be destroyed. This kind of house purchase is the first way to buy a house. The property certificate still belongs to the old owner. From the legal point of view, the property right of the house still belongs to the original landlord. From the signing of the purchase contract to the transfer, the middle may take a long time. In this period, if the price of the house price appears a big difference, it will be doubtful whether the parties can perform the transfer of the purchase contract. House prices have risen too much, and the original owner may rather pay a breach of contract; the house price has fallen too much, and the buyer would rather give up the deposit or part of the purchase.
the "ten" regulation of real estate regulation and control of the tax proof risk. The household household household with 2 sets and more housing in this city, with 1 sets and above housing in the city, can not be paid for 1 years in the city for 2 years. The above non resident household households whose certificates of personal income tax payment or social insurance contributions prove that they are not allowed to sell their houses in the city proper.
in this context, part of the local household register buyers want to pass the company, let the company issue a false wage certificate and make up the social insurance certificate, to the social security department to pay the social security and late payment, to avoid the non native permanent residents to buy a house limit, thus obtain the qualification of buying a house. Mr. Sun is one of them.
although he knew he was "restricted", Mr. Sun came to the sales office to inquire about the details of the implementation of the policy. Seeing him really "sincere", the sales girl told him that he could buy a house by handling false tax certificates. "A company can buy a house as an employee and make up 13 months' tax."
sounds like that. Mr. Sun is moved.
reporter has learned that there have been many "cattle" began to fake tax bills and fake social security business.
[experts remind] fake social insurance and fake personal tax are actually "desperate." Such behavior is actually a violation of policy irregularities, there is a huge risk. First, the unit that helps employees to buy a house is illegal, and most of the units that are affiliated to the insurance are mostly unregulated "bag" companies, often run out of money; secondly, the property buyers may not be in line with the real conditions of the purchase, let the real estate card "hit the drifted", once the relevant departments found this In case of fraud, the real estate certificate may be revoked.