Abolition of death penalty and expert stupidity - who are you fooling to propose to abolish the death penalty? (z)
Song Gong Ming
it is said that this criminal law amendment will abolish 13 economic non violent death sentences. It is also said that the logic of the abolition of the 13 death penalty is so: one is that many of them have no law for more than 20 years; the two is that it is easy to make the Westerners mistaken for us to be a big capital of death; and the three is not just to avoid amnesty and corrupt officials. If that's true, it's really an expert - class stupidity.
what is the penal code for? "The task of the criminal law of the People's Republic of China is to defend the state security, defend the political power and socialist system of the people's democratic dictatorship, protect the property and the collective property of the working masses, protect the private property of the citizens, protect the personal rights and democracy of the citizens, and protect the personal rights and democracy of the citizens. Rights and other rights, safeguarding social order, economic order, and ensuring the smooth progress of socialist construction.
and fight against crime, we must focus on prevention. Kill one is for police hundred, punishment is for educating the majority. Therefore, the penal provisions of the criminal law must be sufficiently deterrent to allow the criminals to be scruples. It is precisely because of the severity of the penal provisions of the criminal law that it has played a role in killing the police. This shows that the power of these Provisions is considerable. How can it be cancelled because it has not been used in the past twenty years? This is not what the brain water is?
the army has not fought for decades. Is it disbanded? The atomic bomb has never been used, why do you have it? Fire extinguishers have never been used before. Are they also thrown away? There are things to be prepared and not. It is a good thing, it is a purpose. If we are not prepared for it, we will be devastating if we have something to do. Is this not a simple truth? What do these experts don't understand?
as for the views of foreign adults, it is even more ridiculous. Is it not the time for Chinese people to see foreigners face? China is a sovereign state and the law is a symbol of sovereignty. China's law is to serve the Chinese people. To embody the will of the Chinese people, why should we consider the views of foreigners? Foreign adults are your parents? Corporal punishment is uncivilized. After liberation, all corporal punishment was abolished. Singapore is also known as a civilized country, but there are still whips in the criminal law of their country, and they have served Americans on flogging. How can they not be afraid of a foreigner's opinion? In British courts, judges are still wearing ridiculous sheepskin hats; American criminal law can be sentenced to hundreds of years in prison. How absurd they are, how do they not be afraid of foreigners' views?
law is a tool for managing society, and management depends on effectiveness. The number of killings depends on whether it works. The death penalty in the United States may be less than that in China, but there may be more deaths per year in cases of gunfire, robbery, murder and rape. China killed two corrupt officials, Liu Qingshan and Zhang Zishan, but educated and saved most of the cadres. So the death penalty is not the issue of the cancellation, but how to use the problem, do not understand the dialectical relationship, the cancellation is very easy, but less this important means, also greatly reduced the deterrence of the criminal law, this is not to find trouble for yourself? Of course, the victims are the country, the society and the people.
at present and even for a long time, economic crime is still a major hazard to society, and it is also impossible for the people to tolerate evil. In particular, serious and malignant economic crimes, not only have great economic losses, but also suffer political damage, they will also cause other criminal cases and cause social unrest, so the social harm is especially serious and the public indignation is great. If it is not sentenced to death (including the reprieve), it must not deter the crime, nor can the people be indignant, the people to the government. The anti-corruption determination and the ability to govern are bound to generate suspicion and dissatisfaction, which pose a great threat to social stability and political stability.