Ji'nan Daily: "only 20% of people can afford affordable housing".
source: the Ji'nan daily author Shi Jingtao
the price of house prices still rise in the future? Rise. Qiu Xiaohua, former director of the National Bureau of statistics, said 9, the real estate industry's golden period is not over yet, and house prices will not rise in ten years. How many people have the ability to buy a house? Only 20%. "China's real estate industry is still in the early stage of market development, and only the richest 20% people have the ability to buy a house," a report on the China real estate financial security assessment, issued by the Beijing Normal University. (December 10th "Yan Zhao Metropolis Daily")
although the "price rise in ten years will not be reversed" argument, only a few words, its scientific and authoritative, still need to be verified by the facts. However, whether it is from the reality of the people's experience, or from the recent North and other large cities and other big cities in succession, "king of the earth" scene, or from Ren Zhiqiang and other real estate big man's judgment, the rising trend of house prices is still obvious.
in fact, it doesn't matter if housing prices continue to rise for 10 years, if 80% of them have the ability to buy houses. After all, the remaining 20% of the disadvantaged groups who do not have the ability to buy houses can have all kinds of relief policies. Or, even if only 20% of the people have the ability to buy a house, if the house price is under the role of macro-control policy, it will be able to return to a reasonable price in the shortest possible time, not for 10 years. These two assumptions are all progressively better and give people hope. However, the numbers are real and can not be hypothetical.
10, 20%, this is a group of almost decadent digital contrast. This means that 80% of the people who do not have the ability to buy houses will continue to suffer from high housing prices for the next 10 years. First, do not have the ability to purchase; two, housing prices continue to rise; three, there is rigid demand. What should I do? Either castration of their own desire to buy a house, or bravely as a housing slave, the limited happiness and happiness of a person's life, put into the unlimited purchase of the house in this big business. In
10, 20%, this is a group of digital comparisons of public policy. Flexing the finger to regulate and control housing prices, it has also been in control for N years. What is the ultimate regulation? Regulation for so many years, house prices will rise in the next 10 years, and the vast majority of people are prohibitive in the face of high house prices and do not have the ability to buy a house. This paradox should reflect on why our public policy has not played its due role. "Ordos families once borrowed money, and now Ordos households are collecting debts." The brutal reality of the estates of Ordos's real estate warns us that only by making house prices rising more slowly and allowing more people to afford to buy houses can we avoid such a pattern of loss and collapse. This needs to be done from two aspects. First, we should further reduce the rising time and space of house prices. We can give the time and patience of macro-control, after all, the entanglement of interests, the need for local government to get out of it, the need for the evolution of the concept of development, and so on, to lead the whole body, can not be immediate, but can never be allowed to rise for another 10 years. The shorter the period, the more people will have the ability to buy houses. The two is to speed up the reform of the income distribution system, and let more people, especially those 80%, do not have the ability to buy a house to achieve "income multiplier", narrow the gap between the rich and the poor step by step, the majority of the people's income is high, the purchasing power is strong, the hoarding "house uncle" will be less and less, with the ability to buy a house, really need. To buy houses will be more and more people, and prices will become more stable, reasonable and rational.