Ji'nan Zhengda city garden public land "villa" developers illegal buildings as neighborhood committees
"villa" in front of Cui yuan building in the two phase of the big city garden. Yu Wen, the reporter of our newspaper,
until the house was delivered, the owner of the No. 3 building of the two phase of the city garden in Ji'nan was found before the building was originally planned as a public land for the green space, and there were a few hundred square meters of "villas", and a wall was built.
22 morning, according to the owner's reflection, the reporter came to the two garden of Zhengda city garden. Reporters noted that in front of building 3, public land, there is an area of hundreds of square meters of "villas". The grey brick monolayer is generally "twenty" shaped, and around two meters high, irregular walls are built. With this wall, residents are more crowded in front of buildings. The villa is almost finished, and many workers are busy at the construction site.
what is the use of this "villa"? A resident of Building No. 3 told reporters that when he sold his house in June 2009, he saw in the plot of the residential district that the public green space and a distribution room were in front of the residential building, and there were no other buildings. Unexpectedly, this year when hand in hand, this public land on such a "villa". He believes that the developers without the consent of the owners, random changes in residential building planning, occupying public land is wrong, to find a residential property, developers to ask for a statement, have not received a satisfactory answer. After
, the resident dialed a number of 12345 hotlines, and the final answer was that in the early July, the matter was transferred to the city tube squadron of Yao's street. "Villas" had been identified as illegal buildings, and the announcement was made for rectification. If the developers did not dismantle themselves, the law enforcement squadron would be forced to dismantle. But up to now, although it has been half a month's deadline, "villa" is intact.
in an interview with reporters, the developer of the district said that the building would be used as the office building of the neighborhood committee. The responsible person of the Yao Jia Street office made it clear that the "villa" is a violation of the building. They did give the developer a notice of "deadline for rectification". Li Tao, the chief of the city management department of the office of Yao's street, Li Tao told reporters that there are some problems in the early planning and construction of the urban garden district. According to the regulations, "no procedures" outside the planning area are all illegal buildings, and the "villa" is illegal. According to the relevant regulations of the Civil Affairs Department, the residence committee is to be established by the number of residents and the size of the city garden, but the construction plan of the developer has not reserved the place of the residence Committee.
"developers are now unwilling to provide land for free to build offices for the neighborhood committees, and directly use the public land in front of the main building." Li Tao said that the specific measures were handled by the urban management and Law Enforcement Bureau of Lixia District.
the reporter then contacted the Chengguan Law Enforcement Bureau, but they said they were handled by the office. They did not get in or receive feedback from the 12345 hotline. Accordingly, the reporter also contacted the deputy director of the city management work of Yao's Street office. The other side made it clear that this "villa" was a violation of the building. Early in the early July, the law enforcement squadron of the office gave the developer a "deadline for rectification".
reporter asked: "since the rectification notice, developers have not seen action, why not deal with it?" The deputy director said that the developer said this "villa" will be used as a residence Committee, the situation is still under verification, and should communicate with the civil affairs department to see if the situation is true. He stressed that during the verification stage, construction could not be carried out.