Re: Oscar's best animated cartoon Tango
in my original understanding, I put more emphasis on understanding why, not what it is, that is, I tend to look for answers to why people repeat, and also take this account of one or two.
what I want to describe is roughly
our perception. The value of
is that negation does not exist.
that is, repetition does not represent value.
, and because of the limitations of our physiology, it leads to the limitations of our cognition, which leads to the limitations of our world.
(my philosophy, influenced by high school political textbooks, may not be a philosophical point of view ~)
first talk about the short film, first I see the child picking up the ball, and then see the crying baby and breast-feeding woman, thieves, reading little girl, return to the home of the man... Then the number of characters that appear, and the number of repetition, can not remember too much, but the impression is that the naked woman, the young man who exercises the body, the man who committed suicide (I always thought he was repairing the light bulb, the result was hindered by the youth, the result fell) the men and women who wanted to be the last woman. People, who take the initiative to pay attention to is a drunkard, and also pay attention to one or two seconds of * * (it seems) to collect garbage.
we are uncommon to explain that the author takes different periods of time in the room, what is not happening in the room (a small part) the same time (in the end, the old woman throws the ball out, the man picks up the ball to avoid the thief or dodge the woman.) Integrate together and show them in a repetitive way, and through this repetition emphasize their impression in our consciousness.
so, how do we know?
if the action in the picture appears only once, and if the playback speed is increased to 10 times or 20 times, or even the speed of light, do they exist? The answer is yes, because we are easily aware of their existence by changing speed to normal speed, which indicates that our perception is limited, that is, if the object is not easy to detect, then we are likely to deny its existence, which is the problem of material development, which can be used. The supersonic wave explains that dogs can hear ultrasound, but we can't. So when we face some perishable things, it is easy to create illusions, for example, that we have only one life, we can easily deny its existence, but in Marx's view, the objective existence is not transferred by consciousness. And when this flaw lies in our specific life, it is easy to question, to doubt, to be correct, and to be reasonable, and to consider the cause and effect, as well as its authenticity, that is, whether God really exists, our consciousness has our own self, or God gives it. The answer, I can't know now, is the category of psychology, that is, the cognitive part, the problem of how human cognition produces, and this part, as far as I know, is still unsettled.
but there is an explanation in the short film: the more times a phenomenon is repeated, and when you are deeply impressed with it, the deeper your memory is. When the thief was stolen from the movie to the end of the film, we knew very well that he was stealing the box. That is, the deepening and strengthening of repetition is a very intuitive memory method, which has already been verified in advertising, and the most effective advertising is repetition and reinforcement. But this is not all. Remember how do you remember nude women? I think a lot of people have a strong impression of nude, and I think that if this nude appears only once in the film, everyone will remember, and then, the self exhausted man, maybe the first time everyone did not remember him, but in that quiet environment, when the voice of Ooh, I think everyone will go Pay attention to him, and every time a sound is made, there will be a conscious or shallow record of them, and then the men and women who give birth to life, all of which are related to our genes and species. All these show that there is something that is limited, not omnipotent, and that if it is omnipotent, we should be able to accurately describe any second in the short film. (about cognitive style, talent and learning is shallow, and the purport is limited, not to speak too much).
so now we continue to assume that in the action of the film, there is a sudden acceleration to the speed of light (the existence and no perception), then we do not know its existence, that is, we realize that the short film will be less, and it is relatively less complete, and this shows the society, the world, the universe. In the Zeus, the result of the influence must be huge, that is to say, we sometimes can not determine a thing is, by chance or inevitable, is always accidental or always inevitable, is accidental or inevitable!? What is our world like our world? Do you have this feeling, I remember when my mother took me to grandma's home when I was very young, I often wonder if she would suddenly become a zombie and eat me out, that is, our cognition can't break the limit of time (the short film has already broken the limits of space in a certain sense), We can't break through the limitations of physiology. Our attention is tendencies, not absolute,
that is, Marx said a famous saying that I forgot, but the general meaning is that people can know something infinite, but people are restricted by the times and can only know a part of it.
the real story, and the value is not the repetition, but the appearance of it, the short film has been complete, showing what, in the 8 minutes we have seen, what has appeared and nothing, that is a part of its value. That is to say, we have only one life, but its existence is different from the non existence can not be denied, whether it is Nietzsche, or Uncle Ben Hua can not deny this point, look around the existence of the people, look at the world, you can say they are nihility? Your admiration, your admiration is nothingness?
so, how can we prove that we exist for hundreds of years, maybe we can use time machine to prove it. We walk in the vanishing.
and then the value of human existence. First, human existence is valuable, and people lose value if they do not exist. This is relative, not absolute. Third, we say that a person is valuable, that is, Marx, because his academic value is valuable, and his academic value represents his value to a certain extent, but his value will never be the only one, for example, how much beef, pork, cow milk is eaten.
absolute 1. Is absolute eternity meaningful?
suddenly remembered, friend's "artificial intelligence" may be true that human beings will develop into aliens.
but I believe that the world is traceable and can be repeated to verify ~ ~ some are, some are not, there are no two leaves in the world.
focus on? Nature銆傘�傘��
inappropriate, I hope you can point out one or two.