"Welfare housing can not be found" or "market failure".
http://opinion.people.com.cn/n/2013/0410/c1003-21087215.html
Ji'nan daily author Yu Qiao
on the 8 day of the Boao Asia Forum on "economic transformation and property control" in the forum, in order to suppress house prices, Pan Shiyi suggested open inquiries, and people can inquire about other people's housing by ID card. Set. However, this proposal was opposed by Ren Zhiqiang. It was considered that some departments' welfare housing distribution information did not enter the housing authority system, and there was difficulty in enquiry. (April 9th "Beijing News")
public housing enquiry can become a good medicine to curb housing prices, and we will not dispute this. However, some of the "welfare houses can not be found" - Ren Zhiqiang's undisclosed "secret", so that the public is quite surprised.
does not deny that "welfare housing allocation can not be found" is not all, but "individual". As for the "individual" proportion, of course, it can not be looked up. But Ren Zhiqiang, known as "real estate man" and "artillery", will not break the mouth of the river. If the welfare housing is only a very limited number of "individual", he dare to make it a reason to oppose Pan - Shiyi viewpoint.
before the housing reform, public housing is mostly public housing; since the planned economy is transferred into the market economy, our country gradually abolished the welfare housing, these public houses through the way of monetary reform into private housing. Of course, there are still some so-called "welfare housing", which belongs to the unit raising funds to build houses, some of which have not handled the real estate certificates. If Ren Zhiqiang's words are true, we can completely imagine that the number of welfare houses that they can't find is "difficult to count" in the country.
, so, a problem is highlighted: some welfare houses do not enter the housing administration system, can not be found, so for many years, this kind of welfare room or will allow the purchase, or is about to be or may implement the 20% tax and property tax policy, such as the property control policy "failure". At present, in addition to individual speculators, the real ability to buy multiple sets of commercial housing is, after all, a minority. A large proportion of those who have multiple suites are those who have one or N welfare housing. If these welfare houses are "not found" and are free from the regulation policy of the property market for a long time, the role of these houses will be discounted even if they take more and more severe market regulation policies.
welfare housing is a product of history, and its owner is exposed to the light of policy. If these welfare houses do not enter the housing administration system, the inquiry can not be found, the group in the purchase, not only because of the "no house" and less tax, but also more to buy a house. In particular, if the 20% tax and property tax are implemented, will they not get even bigger? It is obviously unfair to other citizens. Whether welfare housing or commercial housing, in the property market regulation policy, should be given the same "treatment", how can it be different!
"housing information networking, the supply of second-hand housing will increase." Pan Shiyi's assertion was not unjustified. However, the first is that some cities such as Jiangsu, Fujian and Guangdong have issued new regulations and strict control of "people check out"; two is in the "country five", put forward to the end of "12th Five-Year", all cities and above in principle to achieve networking - the realization of the Internet is not only dragged to the end of the "12th Five-Year", but still "the original" On the contrary, the obscure words have to doubt the sincerity and determination of some localities and departments to strictly control property prices.
someone said well! There is no shortage of methods and paths to control property prices and let them return to the right place. What is lacking is the attitude and determination of some localities and departments to suppress property prices. Try to ask, under the background of tight regulation and control of the property market, some departments' welfare housing information does not enter the system of the housing administration, is it a historical problem, or is it intended to be a vested interest of individual groups? I'm afraid the latter, I'm afraid.
bring all the welfare housing into the housing bureau system as soon as possible, in order to facilitate the inquiry information, and into the regulation policy of the property market, so that "a set of houses can not leak", this "operation" should be timely supplementation.