Should the Ji'nan dog be approved by the neighbour and the neighborhood committee?
Author: http://news.e23.cn/Content/2011-03-27/201132700020.html
Author: Chen Tongtong Wang Zhiting
recently, the media reported in succession: "the regulation of dog management in Ji'nan" is brewing reform. It is proposed that the dogs need to pass the permission of the neighbours in the future and should be issued to the neighborhood committee to deal with it. Proof of dogs. Many people talk about it and question the executability of the new rules. There are many "alley prime ministers" that can not sit down.
the Prime Minister of the alleyway: increase the burden of the work of the neighborhood committee
in the Eastern District as the Prime Minister of the alleyway Ren Hong (the pseudonym) is the first to contact the reporter. She said the residents who found the neighborhood committee every day were almost quick to break the threshold, "whether it was business, housing, car sales, pension insurance, unemployment proof, housing notarization, even ID card loss, all kinds of proof need the neighborhood committee to" stamp ". Once a dog is raised, it needs to be sealed by the neighborhood committee, which makes it somewhat unbearable.
Mr. Zhang of the Tianqiao District without Yingshan street, said that the neighborhood committee is a resident autonomous organization, and the nature of the work is different from the government. It is mainly responsible for coordinating the settlement of neighbourhood disputes. The main problem of raising dogs is to be managed by the public security organs and the epidemic prevention stations. "Now the neighborhood committees are complicated, and many things need proof from the neighborhood committees. If the proof of dog should be handed over to the neighborhood committee, we will have a lot of pressure. If we prove that the household has the condition to keep the dog, and after the problem, in case the treatment is not good, then the contradiction will be intensified, and the residents will have a sense of distrust to the neighborhood committee. "
reporter then interviewed the community neighborhood committee of the Baihua Park in the calendar district. Mr. Liu, the staff member, believed that it was a good thing to ask the neighbor's opinion to raise a dog. It could reduce the contradiction, but it was not significant to ask the neighborhood committee to prove it. Responsibility is guaranteed.
dog citizens: poor operability, easy to trigger the contradiction of
"I think it is not very realistic to raise a dog to seek the consent of the neighbor. Everyone's preferences are different and difficult to get unified." Mr. Guo, who loves dogs very much, expounded his views through the times QQ. According to Mr. Guo, he had a pable dog in his family, and the puppy had scared away the thief. Mr. Guo told reporters: "as long as it is necessary for the dog citizens to raise their dogs and raise their dogs legally, it is not necessary for me to ask for the relevant provisions of the neighbourhood and the residence Committee."
Ms. Wei, who lives in East Street, lives in Ying City, said that dog breeding should be a matter of choice for the citizens themselves. "In order for pets to be certified as pets in time, if there are problems, they should be chased according to the chip implanted on their pets. If the new rules of the four neighbours agree, if the wishes of their dogs are rejected, they will often cause discord among neighbors and increase the contradiction between neighbors. Ms. Wei said.
some citizens also say that the neighbourhood of some houses is not good enough to know each other. If it is embarrassing to knock off a family's door in order to keep a dog, and the neighbourhood is too large, there are more than ten neighbors in the same floor, and many of the neighbors are in the neighbourhood.
no dog citizens: the new regulations should supervise the civilized dog
some residents who do not have dogs in the family think that the opinion of the neighbours should be used as a reference for a breed of dogs, but the "seal" of the neighborhood committee is not necessary. "In our elevator, there are always residents who connive at dogs to urinate." Mr. Zhu of the public said that he was not too concerned about dog raising in his own family. He paid more attention to the new regulations that should be strengthened in the field of civilized dog breeding.
many people say that new rules of dog breeding should be managed from the source of pets into the home of the public, for example, to strengthen pet screening and to strengthen management for no dogs and unlicensed dogs. In case of dog bites, dog owners should be held accountable. As long as these details are clear, it can be said that dogs are standardized from another aspect, and will not bring operational difficulties.
more people pointed out that before the new rules of dog breeding were introduced, the relevant provisions of "housing reform business" needed to be signed by the four neighbors. But in the actual operation, it seems that the four neighbourhood signatures do not have the force of coercion. In many communities, the "housing reform" phenomenon is common, but there is no right to speak at all. Only a few cases of legal ways have been protected. "If the new rules of dog breeding are copied," it will be more difficult to operate. " Some people confessed that such a new regulation might end up as a mere scrap of paper. "There is no dog to seek four neighbourhood opinions, and no one goes to the neighborhood committee to 'stamp'. When there is a contradiction between breeding dogs, people will first think of dialing '110' to go to the public security department for processing."