source: 2010-5-26 Qilu Evening News
residential buildings, each unit door to the industry committee and the property of the "open letter".
the fire lane in the district is not only full of cars but also parking spaces.
talk about the disputes between the owners and the property, the industry committee said that the contradiction between the two has a long history, this is the outbreak of the accumulation of contradictions to a certain extent.
[b] fuse [/b]
[b] divergence originates from a notice of rising price of property fees [/b]
Guo Lukuan, director of the owner committee of Yan Liu Garden, told reporters 24 days ago that the disputes between the owner and the property were caused by a long time, in fact, not only the contradiction between the owners and the property, but the event was more spear. An explosion that accumulates to a certain degree. "It is easy to do well, and it is difficult to say that it is difficult to do." The problem is not just those mentioned in the material.
"the documents on the doors of the buildings and the doors of all the units are posted by us. The open letter of the property is that they asked the cleaner to paste it later." Guo Lukuan said, "there are reasons for it. In fact, the contradiction between the owner and the property is not two days a day." He found out a notice for reporters in April 18th of this year. The notice is set out: all the owners, you are good, please send the water and electricity charges to the property office before 30. The deadline of the property fee is April 30th, and it will be charged at 0.70 yuan per square meter in May 1st. We hope that the owners will have a good time to pay the fees, and we will charge double cease days.
"it's too bossy not to ask residents' opinions in advance." Guo Lukuan said that the notice of Yan Liu Yuan in Wuguan can be regarded as the fuse for this incident. The reporter learned from the report on solving the three problems of Yan Liu Garden, posted by the Yan Liu Garden Industry Commission (hereinafter referred to as "the report") that in April 30th, the Commission issued a "open letter on the urgent need to solve three problems" (hereinafter referred to as "the open letter"), directly referring to the Ji'nan Jiayuan property service public service. Department of management of the Department of Yan Liu Yuan. That evening, someone would tear the open letter posted on the unit door of the District Committee and the district government dormitory. In the evening of May 2nd, a total of more than 80 open letters were tore on the gates of units 2 to 15, and elsewhere.
the report says: the Management Office of the Yan Liu Garden ignored the open letter and refused to answer the question. Through the study of the Industry Council, the two pages of paper had to be posted.
[b]'s view of [/b]
[b] property Tat against "reply" to the "report" posted by the [/b]
, in response to this, the property in the "reply" said that with the improvement of living standards, the owners of Yan Liu Garden have multiplied, and the problem of parking is difficult. This is also a common problem in Ji'nan and even the whole country. They are very happy to arouse the owners' attention to the fire channel parking, and the property companies have also done a lot of prompts for the fire corridors to stop parking.
contradiction also has two problems of pressurized water consumption. The Industry Council considers that the water quality in the residential area is defective and drinking is not safe. The property said in the reply that the company carried out pool cleaning, water quality testing and daily inspections according to the requirements of relevant departments, and the relevant systems were sound. On this basis, the property company also contributed to the purchase of ozone generator, improved drinking water standards, the above work has been approved by the water sector.
[b] dispute focal point [/b]
[b] contradiction has long been argued in the three major issues. [/b]
reporter learned from the report and a public letter to the owner of the Yan Liu Garden - a reply to the owner committee document of the Yan Liu Yuan (hereinafter referred to as "the reply"), the owner and the property The contradictions are mainly concentrated in three aspects: property charges, two pressurized water and fire passage.
it is understood that the Department of management of Yan Liu Yuan increased the service fee from 0.45 yuan per square meter per month to 0.6 yuan to 0.7 yuan. The Commission considered it to be a violation of the property management regulations and relevant regulations of Shandong and Ji'nan. The report said that before the Management Office of the Yan Liu Garden did not reach an agreement with the Industry Council, the owners and tenants paid the property service fee at 0.45 yuan per square metre. At the same time, the report points out that the service quality of the management office is very poor. "The service is not in place, the quality of service is not improved, and we want to raise management fees." An elderly person in the district told reporters that "property charges unilaterally raise prices, so we did not ask for our advice."
property in the "reply", said that the property fee of Yan Liu Yuan began in 2000, according to 0.4 yuan per square meter (here and 0.45 yuan per square meter of the industry committee is not consistent. Editor's note) the price has not been adjusted for several years. With rising prices, especially soaring prices in 2007, the cost of property expenditure has risen too much, and property funds have been unable to make ends meet. In order to serve the owners better, according to the cost calculation, and put on record to the price bureau at the same time, the price of the property fee is adjusted to 0.7 yuan per square meter, but considering the owner's long-term support to the property, for the owner to thank the owner, the property fee before May this year has been charged at 0.6 yuan per square meter, and after May, it is all charged by 0.7 yuan per square meter. .
makes the Yan Liu Garden Industry Committee dissatisfied with the fire safety problems of the community. "Ming Ming wrote," no parking is allowed in the fire escape. "You see the fire lane is not only full of cars but also rented out. Guo Lukuan pointed to the blurred yellow line at the parking lot, telling reporters that there had been two fires in the District, and the fire trucks were hard to enter. "Fire engines can't get in in time. There are so many cars. What happens if there's a fire burning camp?"
.Quot;.Quot; four questions were raised respectively: property fees, two pressurized water safety problems, fire safety issues and property withdrawal problems, and the property company's.Quot; the big character newspaper.Quot; in these four aspects, a reply was made.
why is the property fee going up? Why does tap water don't drink well? Why is the fire passage unimpeded... In the last few days, in the propaganda column of the provincial town of Yan Liu Yuan, the "big character newspaper" from the district industry committee and the property company have been posted, and the two are the opposite "debate" on the differences and contradictions between each other.
the residents of Yan Liu Yuan District told reporters that the contradiction between the industry committee and the property company has been a long history, and this public "debate" is only a more intense expression.
24 afternoon, the reporter came to the east of the provincial city of Yan Liu garden area. In the propaganda column near the door, the reporter saw the "open letter" from the district industry committee and the property company. The two sheets of paper on the left and bottom are from the "owner committee of the Yan Liu Garden". The title is "the report on solving the three problems of the Yan Liu Garden", the time of the fall is May 20th, and the right side of the two sheets is juxtaposed. The post is an open letter to the owner of the Yan Liu Garden - a reply to the document of the owner committee of the Yan Liu Yuan, which is "Ji'nan Mei Jia Yuan Property Management Co., Ltd.", with the time of May 23rd. In addition, there is a detailed description of the annual revenue and expenditure of Yan Liu Yuan in 2009.
, later, the reporter found in the Yan Liu Yuan District, in addition to "Yan Liu Yuan 2009 annual revenue and expenditure detail", from the 2 building to the 15 building in the District, the gate of each unit of the 14 building has 4 bulletins, the content is exactly the same as the 4 posted on the propaganda column of the district gate. In addition, on the floor of many buildings, the reporters also found the same 4 announcements.
"the service is not in place, but also unilaterally raise the property fee." An old man walking in the neighborhood said. From the bulletin posted by the reporter, there are four questions in the report of the Commission: property fees, two pressurized water use, fire safety and the withdrawal of property. In the open letter of the property company, a reply is made to these four aspects.
"if the karma wants us to withdraw, the work of the property can not be carried out normally and can not continue to provide the normal property services for the owners, the Commission will do a good job of the selection and admission of the new property company as soon as possible, and contact with us in time to carry out the transfer." The property company's open letter responds.
[b] solution [/b]
[b] weekend will open a joint meeting to solve the contradiction [/b]
reporter in the two "open letter" see, the Yan Liu Garden Industry Committee and the United States Jiayuan property service company Yan Liu Yuan Management Office has reached the degree of "property withdrawal and retention".
the report posted by the journalists' Commission learned that in the negotiations between the KMA and the property, the director of the Management Office of the Yan Liu Yuan was more than once said, "no, we will withdraw." The Industry Council said, "when will you withdraw?" At that time, we must beat the gongs and drums to send it. " In this regard, the property in the reply, said, "if the owners committee wants us to withdraw, so that the work of the property can not be normally carried out, can not continue to provide the normal property services for the owners, the owners committee as soon as possible to do a good job in the selection and entry of new property companies, and timely contact with us for the transfer of work. "."
Guo Lukuan, director of the Yan Liu Garden Industry Committee, told reporters that this Saturday, they will hold a joint meeting, which will be attended by the industry committee, property, neighborhood committees and offices. "The public said that the public is reasonable, the grandmother is reasonable, we sit down, in a fair, open, fair, friendly attitude and the principle of seeking truth and pragmatism, act according to the policy, together to solve this problem."