Ji'nan won't have a two - child Award 2000 yuan? Inaccurate£¡
Shandong commercial newspaper reporter Zhang Mengyao
recently, one is entitled "the people of the calendar district have 2000 patches, do you have?" The article appeared in the circle of friends of many people in the WeChat. In the article, it was called "the couple who married late childbirth in Lixia District in recent years, and voluntarily gave up two thousand yuan reward for the second child". Is this news that is widely concerned and reprinted? Is it true? Reporters yesterday afternoon exclusive interview with the Ji'nan calendar Department of health and family planning (hereinafter referred to as "the calendar under the calendar"), the news was not accurate. "We hope to refute rumours through the Shandong business daily, and we hope that netizens will pay attention to verification when they publish and forward information." Reporter Zhang Mengyao
Xinhua News calendar, the District Security Bureau related staff told reporters that there are three main mistakes in the net post: "one is to expand the range of people to enjoy subsidies, two is posted in the net post." It is not true to inform the photo that the "population and Family Planning Commission of Lixia District" is not true. Three, there is no official seal of the notice. The staff said that there was indeed a relevant reward policy for "giving up second children" in Lixia District, but there are specific requirements and scope.
since 2003, according to the relevant policies, the husband and wife who voluntarily only have one child for the late marriage and late childbearing and the conditions of second children in accordance with the conditions of childbearing and children, if the couple or one of them are the urban unemployed in the jurisdiction of the domicile, they can declare the second child reward during the period of childbearing age. It is important to note that, since the "comprehensive two child" policy has not yet reached the ground, both husband and wife are not only the only child and are not in line with the second child policy, nor can they apply for the second child reward.
for the residents who meet the above conditions, they can declare the street offices where they are located in their domicile place, register by the street offices and review the first instance and the calendar Bureau of the calendar. After the examination and approval, a one-time award will be issued. If a reward is given, the couple will have a reproductive act, and the reward amount must be returned. The staff of the District Security Bureau told reporters that the family planning cadres in the district will notify the residents who are in accordance with the relevant policies every year according to the situation of the residents in their jurisdiction. If the information has changed, please consult with the family planning department of the domicile place. "This year, eligible couples can still apply, with a deadline of November 20, 2015."
at 3:45 yesterday afternoon, the original reading volume has reached more than 30 thousand and 6 times, and due to the high attention of the information, one day yesterday, the Department related departments of the calendar has received hundreds of telephone calls from the public. "The public address was not contacted with us before issuing the information, and the information was not accurate. Today we are busy clarifying the news." The staff said. Yesterday afternoon, the relevant staff of the District Security Bureau sent a call to the WeChat public, which first issued the information. The other said "the article is shared by the netizens." Under the request of the staff of the Health Bureau of Lixia District, the public number has deleted the false information and explained it.
the public number that has a large number of fans should go to the minimum Prudential obligation
"really, because an online post has caused us to pick up the phone from work to work at night, and the normal work has been messed up." "Our phone is easy to check," said a staff member of the District Security Bureau. "It's like a resident can call and contact us to consult it. For inexplicable "lying gun" related departments, how to protect rights? What are the responsibilities of public operators who do not verify false information? The reporter consulted Li Jingtao, director of the Shandong wind port law firm.
Li Jingtao lawyer said that the network subject, especially the large and influential WeChat and micro-blog users, should do the duty of prudence in spreading the network information, and verify and discriminate the sources and authenticity of the information. Lessons should be learned from unintentional or negligent dissemination of false information, and criticism and education should be given to the deliberate dissemination of false information and the bad consequences of disseminating false information due to major negligence. Disseminating on the information network, or organizing, directing personnel to spread on the information network, affecting the public order, may be suspected of illegal or even criminal, and should bear the corresponding legal responsibility. "From this point of view, there are two possibilities of" negligence "and" deliberate ". If the WeChat public operator who posted the post was inadvertently released incorrect information on policy misunderstandings, it would be a negligent act. The publisher should immediately delete the false information and correct it, and eliminate the influence at the location of dissemination which is not lower than the original publication scope. Li Jingtao said, "but it is worth considering whether it is due to carelessness." As the WeChat public number with large fans and strong communication power, the most basic Prudential obligation should be done. "From the original post, there is no official seal in the" notice "photo issued, and the publisher should verify its origin and authenticity. If information is released without verification for communication power and influence or other commercial purposes, it is suspected of deliberately creating or disseminating false information.
the interpretation of the application of the Supreme People's court and the Supreme People's Procuratorate on the application of law in criminal cases for the use of information network in criminal cases published in September 2013. The fifth articles and second paragraphs refer to the creation of false information, or false information that is knowingly made, disseminate in the information network, or organize, In accordance with the provisions of paragraph 1 (four) of the 293rd article of the criminal law, the punishment of the convictions of provocation will be made in accordance with the provisions of paragraph 1 (four) of the criminal law.