Re: is the most common shortcut in the field of excellence.
result thinking is a way of thinking that transforms one's abilities and actions into values.
Communication is only a process, and consensus is the result --- you often hear people say, "I communicate, but he doesn't listen." In fact, this process has no result. For others, you have never done anything.
Learning is just a process, learning is the result --- you often hear people say, "I wake up every day and read columns." But second days you asked him how much he remembered, but not much. After a week, you ask him, what's the change? In fact, nothing changed. This will not leave any consequences for your life. We often have people who are busy all day without results. < br /> people seem to be generally trapped in a collective confusion and anxiety, that is, a deep sense of boredom in today's work, numerous times want to switch track, but do not know whether they can successfully switch, their future is full of self-confidence.
For everyone in the workplace, if you want to get a sense of accomplishment from work, if you want to make a difference at work, if you want to be the irreplaceable one, you need to go from being stupid to being able to work, from being able to work to being able to work beyond being able to work, and ultimately to be able to create work, with each advance. Your anxiety will naturally decrease, and with it your sense of accomplishment will increase, and the work will gradually reveal its interesting and challenging aspects. Br < br /> < br /> 04 < br /> People who do one thing for ten years and people who do ten things a year are destined to have very different fates < br /> Because of the shortcomings of the preceding few points, this phenomenon occurs: many people change jobs frequently, their career trajectories seem to be disorderly and scattered, unable to form a point. A main line, not to mention potential energy; a few people's career trajectory is regular, although they can not say, but basically can see a main line.
so the problem is coming. Most people work for others: for their parents, for their bosses, and for their families, they separate work from life, and it is difficult to mobilize genuine enthusiasm to do one thing, so many people cope with it perfunctorily at work without knowing why, and let such people do something definite It's okay to ask for specific work, but it's hard to get them to plan, design, and plan for themselves. This situation is actually a common phenomenon, although most people are busy after work every day, but only a small number of people really work hard to study what they do, and in order to do these work to the utmost to learn, think.
So after most people have passed the career adjustment period, they stop and do not make further progress: because he lacks the motivation for continuous progress, unable to further study and continuous progress, which is the root of many people's "middle-aged crisis".
Know that competence alone will soon be overtaken or even replaced, and that there is not much unique value in the workplace for individuals, but if you are willing to delve into a particular field, you will gradually open the gap with others.
As the saying goes, you're actually ahead of a lot of people in the process of studying your work. If you don't have this habit, it's easy to satisfy yourself and you can't make further progress. There's a joke in
05 < br/> that some men have been wondering, "Who do I love?"
In his opinion, it is very difficult to find an ideal partner: Jasper in a small family has the elegance of Jasper in a small family, and lady in a big family has the demeanor of lady in a big family. No matter what kind of women, they all have their own charm and characteristics. < br /> and the man began to try and try again and again. As a result, she found that no matter what type of woman she was, she would have such and such shortcomings, and as long as the other side's shortcomings were exposed, the man could not stand it and turned to find a more suitable partner.
Think about it. Are those people who are always in the "don't know what to like" workplace like the men in the example?