How is the "35 year old crisis" in the workplace broken?
origin: surging news commentator Chen Sha
"Why are people asked to be under 35 years old?" My friend, Xiao ou, has been very troubled recently.
graduated from a famous university in the south, she worked in a foreign company for several years, and became a full-time mother after she was born. This year, the child was two years old, and she decided to go to the workplace again. Because I was a teacher when I was little, and I had experience in part-time education in University. She decided to change her career from teaching. However, a public teacher recruitment examination notice in the area found that a social worker applied for examination, one had two or three years of teacher experience, and the two was under the age of 35. Xiao Ou is 32 years old and has more than half a year to test her teacher's certificate. She feels hopeless.
my classmates have a similar experience. She is a journalist in a newspaper in a province. Considering the birth of a second child, she wants to job hopping for a relatively easy job. But when we look at recruitment conditions, there is also a "35 year old" restriction. Finally, only a company registered last year when she was 35 years old agreed to interview her, but in the field. She hesitated again.
this is really a reality. Many employers recruit staff, will be expressly provided for only 35 years of age, 35 years old seems to have become the workplace life and death line. This is the so-called "35 year old crisis".
"35 year old crisis" not only affects job seekers, but also the heart of the incumbent. In the previous period, a well-known private enterprise, "to persuade the 34 years old engineer" incident, and another famous private enterprise "42 year old engineer jump" incident to explode friends circle, has let the number of 35 years old and is about to enter the 35 year of the workplace.
to ask: after 35 years old, can only feel the malice from the workplace? Who deprived the group of the right to re employment and job hunting?
someone has analyzed the reasons why employers refuse to recruit people over 35 years old: first, this is a higher level rule; second, the people after 35 years of age are generally energetic, passionate, and more innovative, and third, after 35 years of age, all aspects of treatment are generally higher than those in the workplace and are considered from the perspective of benefit and cost. People prefer to choose a "cheap and fine" young labor force.
looks very reasonable. But I can't agree.
in modern society, the age of 35 is still a young man. Energy and passion, even if it is not a young man, is still in a period of rising or smooth. This age is the career development and transformation period of many people.
it is said that the cost of employment is high, and it does not see the value created by employees aged 35 or above. People at this stage tend to have more advantages in experience, experience and mentality.
as for "superior regulations", the rules are also formulated by the people. Why do we persist in holding this rule persistently when the objective environment changes?
job and job search, in the end, is the market behavior that you wish I wish, as long as the applicant can prove that he has the ability to do the job. Is it reasonable to set a threshold of age in a preconceived and rigid way, and to discuss heroes with age?
What's more, in the context of delayed retirement, 25-30 years of retirement and more than 35 years of age are rejected. This group, if there is a change in work or the need for reentry into the workplace, especially the single or family burdens that must work, can be done in addition to unemployment and disappointment.
in fact, the change is also happening.
during the "two sessions" this year, Huang Hua, deputy director of the Guangdong delegation, suggested abolishing the upper limit of 35 years of age for civil servants to recruit talents.
the Beijing Youth Daily reported that at the first meeting held in a well-known recruitment platform, 7 top hunting agencies collectively "reaped" 35 year old talents with a annual salary of up to 4 million yuan. According to the person in charge of the meeting, over 35 of job seekers account for about 60% of the total number of job seekers.
but the embarrassing thing is that the proposal of the NPC does not seem to have enough attention to the media and the public, nor has it seen the follow-up action of the relevant departments, and the high-end talent is only a few.
for most people, after the age of 35, the workplace may be narrower and narrower. Employers seem to have ignored the fact that the majority of people over the age of 35 can do a good job. They are the indispensable "base" for most units.
, and not any job in any field is to eat "youth meal". For teachers and other professions, the older they are, the more valuable they are. Setting the threshold of 35 years old in these fields is more incomprehensible, hinders a large number of outstanding talents and is directly related to the quality and level of national education.
of course, if 35 years old really become a problem, there may be economic pressure and social security considerations. But these can only hope for the amendment and improvement of the relevant system, rather than escape and boycott on the basis of age.
in the final analysis, a person, if he is not aggressive, even only 19 years old, is also a withered tree. If it is high, even if the year has eight days, it can also shine. In this era of passion and vitality, this is especially true in a society with an average life expectancy of seventy or eighty years and a retirement age.
the 35 year old group in the prime of life is young and has a long road. When they have the will and ability to struggle, why should people set up inappropriate age barriers and shoot them too early on the beach in the workplace? This is not only a loss to individuals and families, but also a loss to society.