origin:
Ji'nan network
recently, everyone was covered by the government work report on the problem of primary and secondary school students' burden reduction, parents' comments on the burden of minus It is mixed and mixed.
someone thinks the direction of the loss is right, because it is unreasonable to let a young child do his homework at night and not finish at ten in any case; let a child run almost every day on the way of a variety of classes of interest classes, and there is no enough time to play and exercise, which is not conducive to the overall development of the child. Of course, there are also parents who feel that the burden of loss is the responsibility of the school to shirk the responsibility, to give more responsibility to the society, to the family education, and to let the parents fall into the arms race of extracurricular training.
the most heated discussion is to let the pupils go to school at half past three, and the child's school delivery has been the most painful of every family. Because it means that every family has a full-time mother / full time Dad, or grandparents who can help with their children, they have to live in a city, have a good health, and do not require their own old life, because there is a person in the family that promises a working day in the afternoon. Don't do it. Pick up the children at 2-3 and finish the homework with your child. This is a little higher for grandparents and grandparents.
the question is, who is responsible for the time after half past three?