Why Re: burden reduction will be opposed by parents?
in the process of reducing the burden of burden, because of cognitive deviations and other reasons, some of the negative measures have led to some deviations, which objectively increase the burden, and also easily lead to opposition from parents.
exam is one of them. When you don't know when to start, the difficulty and difficulty of the examination and test are directly hooked with the burden. Once the exam is said to be a burden, the exam is cancelled as much as possible, and the cancellation of the entrance examination may be a heavier learning burden.
survey shows that at present, primary and secondary school students bear the worst hit areas in primary schools, but relatively less in high schools. Why? The main source of good future (learning and thinking) comes from compulsory education, especially in the training of primary school. What is the reason? It's worth thinking.
one of the reasons is that there is no entrance examination, everyone wants to go to a good school, but the good school wants to recruit students, so all kinds of craters, a variety of special classes, all kinds of competition classes, everywhere, the invisible add more burdens. Recently, the Ministry of Education issued a notice that explicitly requested that all special recruitment admissions be abolished by 2020. That is a targeted measure. In contrast, there is only one college entrance examination in senior high school. Children do not have to go to so many classes, but the burden is relatively small.
it is not advisable to reduce the difficulty of the selection test. It is not advisable for the
test to be buckled with the pronoun, and many basic evaluations have been stopped. At the basic level of education, the quality of the teacher's teaching is also lost a basic method of evaluation (we can not ask everyone to be educationists and use comprehensive evaluation instead). Objectively, it also leads to lax and muddling of rural grass-roots teachers, and the decline of education governance also brings negative voices.
the difficulty of examination is not directly related to the burden, but it is also included in the burden reduction option. At the same time, it is necessary to reduce the difficulty of the test, especially the continuous pattern, the level and the simplification of the selection test, and these surface mitigation measures, in reality, may become an important push to promote the exam oriented education, and thus promote the increase of the burden.
instead of the national college entrance examination, it is hard to see which training institution has achieved a unique position.
the greatest success, the biggest loss, when the exam can't get the results through simple mechanical brushes, is the biggest loss, not the simplistic.
reduce burdens should also avoid falling into the trap of beautifying landscaping, and not using low standard school education as a benchmark for lightening the burden.
Education Governance in recent decades, many of our experts frequently say how easy education in Britain and America is, and we also love to give guidance to China.
it is not to say that most of the best elites in the United States are dominated by private schools, and the high standards of high standards in private schools, even in relatively loose American public schools, have a general class of talent, which is to give those excellent students a different space for development. More importantly, in recent decades, American presidents have carried out merciless denial of public education which overemphasizes relaxed but deteriorating quality. When George W. Bush was in power, the regulation measure adopted by public schools was to evaluate and decide the appropriation of public schools through the evaluation of students' achievements. Obama publicly criticized that every year 1 million high school students drop out of school, and American students lag far behind other developed countries in math and other subjects. If this is the future of American education, I will not accept it. In order to improve the quality of primary and secondary education and push for the construction of the government funded charter schools, the Obama administration, while calling for 1 hours of late school, has more options for students' parents. Before he came to power, Trump gave a ruthless denial to the public primary and secondary schools. He hired Worster to be the Minister of education at the beginning of the stage. The controversial minister advocated the Education Voucher Policy: give money to parents and let them vote with their feet.
when we fiercely criticize our Olympiad, Britain invites Chinese mathematics teachers to pass on the treasures to Britain. Before he went to his office, Prime Minister Cameron openly criticized the comments that could be replaced by a calculator and no need to learn the Chinese back multiplication table, calling for more tiger mother spirit in the British education community.
as a result, we should also pay attention to the loss of burden. We should not pursue absolute ease, no burden, nor should the practice of the Anglo American and other countries prove wrong, or correct the practice of introspection, as a sample of our burden reduction.
a Japanese friend has indignantly talked about Japan's burden reduction. On the first day, the child got full marks in English, and he was filled with joy. As a result, he got angry when he looked at the questions. The 26 letters were 100 letters. When Mr. Lu, a teacher at Fudan University, talked about the consequences of Japan's 30 year reduction, he also talked about the strange phenomenon: the burden of students increased and the burden of parents increased, especially the economic burden. More importantly, an important consequence of Japan's burden reduction is the retreat of the country and the rise of private schools. 30 years ago, the first 20 secondary schools provided to University of Tokyo, 17 were public and 3 were private. But after 30 years of burden reduction, this figure is completely reversed, and only 3 are public.
under the command of excessive emphasis on public insurance basic, one size fits all and other unsuitable educational measures, some places have begun to appear in similar countries, the best primary and secondary schools have begun to take private schools as the main ones. This is worthy of our vigilance and deviating from the social nature of our country.
is it wrong to reduce the burden and how to reduce the reasonable
this rebound, more or less, also reflects the people's concern about the decline in the quality of school education under the backdrop of a minus.
is it wrong? Differentiated burden reduction and precise burden reduction are effective ways to resolve misunderstanding of burden reduction and resolve parents' objection.
many people are against the government's burden reduction. It is considered that the burden reduction is a false propositional proposition, and it is a basic right to intervene between parents and students.
, however, lightening the burden is the first thing to emphasize is to reduce the excess burden, not to avoid learning too much. Reducing burdens is a burden that we want to grow in an all-round way, minus those repetitive training. The government must bear the responsibility of a government