The "speed" tutorial class is now completed in the first half of the year.
according to the life gang of Shandong radio and television station, it is said that the tutoring class is based on the class hours and how long it is. But Ms. Meng in Ji'nan met with a tutorial class, but there was no reduction in class hours.
Ms. Meng, the son of Ji'nan, has just arrived in second grade. In May, she gave her children a big tutorial in Ji'nan. According to the child's learning condition, he made a learning plan for him. The agreement is scheduled for May 5th next year until December of this year.
at that time, the school's explanation was that the children's academic performance could be improved, so Ms. Meng agreed with the school curriculum. But in August of this year, a phone call from the school confused Mrs. Meng, and the lecture was over.
Ms. Meng had consulted the school at that time why to speed up the children's class schedule, the school explained that, because of the high enthusiasm of the children, they had finished the rest of the class during the summer vacation. Ms. Meng was not satisfied with the explanation of the school. In order to know more about the situation, reporters and Ms. Meng together found the Ji'nan Education University Yanshan campus.
Ji'nan school education Yanshan school district director explained that children have encountered difficulties in the process of learning, he needs to speed up the frequency, he is like eating or not eating is the same, so will give children the adjustment of time, specific or slow, is according to the actual situation of the child. And the staff also showed their children's signature in class, saying that the teacher at school had informed Ms. Meng about the progress of the class. But Ms. Meng disagreed with the school's statement. She only knew that she signed or walked, did not know the problem of class hours, and he really did not communicate.
the two sides insist on the fact that Ms Meng knows that the school is speeding up the class hour. No one can convince anyone. In such a situation, who should bear the responsibility? The reporter consulted with the lawyer. The lawyer said that as a party to the contract, the school needs to change the contract. It is the need to obtain the consent of the other party, Ms. Meng.
the lawyer said that the school has to change the course unilaterally, and if it does not take effective legal evidence to prove that it has changed the course of communication and consultation with the students and the parents of the students and the way to perform the course, then the school should bear the corresponding liability for breach of contract according to the contract. All for the sake of children, I hope both sides can sit down and talk.