Can the car be on the ride? Ji'nan Management Center: check the charge by black car
Qilu
on 10 days of the Ministry of transportation and transportation, "Interim Measures for the management of operation and service of network booking taxis (solicitation draft)" It is forbidden to provide operation services in the name of private minibus in combination or carpool and wind cars. But the Ministry of transport also said that it would encourage car sharing without profit making and encourage public participation in carpool. What is the operation service? Not to be profitable for the purpose of understanding? Does the current car service still continue? In this case, the Ji'nan Center for management believes that the private car is a free car as long as the charge is a drop in the.Amp; ne operation, the cost of sharing oil is not the purpose of profit.
Ji'nan customer management center: the charge is the unlicensed operation of
in July of this year. The Ji'nan customer management center has made a qualitative analysis of the dripping car, which is considered to be an illegal vehicle and will be regarded as a black car like a special car. All costs involved are illegal operations. Cui Bing, the head of the center for management, said.
the customer management center thinks that the reason why paid carpool is illegal operation is that there is money transaction in the process of paid carpool. Money trading is one of the main characteristics of business activities. If fees are charged, there must be trading activities. The owners of paid carpools charge fees to provide services for passengers. However, they do not carry out relevant documents. They are unlicensed operations and are typical illegal operations.
a staff member of Ji'nan traffic bureau also said that they had been vigorously investigating illegal operations, including private cars connected to special vehicle platforms. As of October 8th, 289 illegal operating vehicles have been seized, including 65 online reservation vehicles.
drop company: paid carpool.Amp; ne operating
.Amp; lsquo paid carpool.Amp; rsquo in the process of.Amp; lsquo money trading.Amp; rsquo, but essentially sharing the cost. Yesterday, the relevant staff of the Department of public relations told reporters that there was no profit or profit. It was only for the vehicle owners and passengers to share the cost of the road oil, so it could not be simply defined as illegal operation.
.Amp; lsquo operates.Amp; rsquo aims to make profits. The carpool is a vehicle with the same route as the owner of the car. It is not for the purpose of operation. It is not a special delivery person. It is convenient for others, but also convenient for other people, even when the owner is carrying others, but it is only used to make up for its own cost, and it is essential to the operating income. Different.
the staff said that at present, dripping vehicles have already been launched in 338 cities nationwide, with 5 million 500 thousand owners and 8 million 400 thousand passengers. Among them, there are more than 60 thousand people registered in Ji'nan and 1.2 yuan per kilometre, which is charged for a part of the time according to the different road conditions. This is quite different from the way the Ministry of transportation provides for the sharing of fuel costs and tolls or free travel.
downwind owner: the ride on the road does not operate for the purpose of
the carpool is a ride on the road. It is not the purpose of the operation, it is not a special delivery. It is convenient for others, but it also facilitates the other people, even when they are carrying others, but this reward is only used to make up for the cost. Expenditure is essentially different from operating income. Private car owner Mr. Zheng told reporters that since he landed in Ji'nan, he has been using software orders, so far he has received more than 280 orders.
car owners to provide convenience to the rider, time, fuel consumption and so on to varying degrees, the cost of vehicles will inevitably increase, even if paid, and only to subsidize the cost of driving, not to get beyond the economic benefits beyond the normal loss of their own driving. In this, he has not yet encountered a fee dispute, because the software will automatically show the estimated price before the call, passengers feel acceptable, cheaper than taxi orders, both sides are voluntary sharing.
passengers: more save money and trouble, do not want to disappear
the people's network has done a special survey on the topic of the carpool, found that 90% of the workplace are willing to carpool, and up to 40% of the workplace have spelled the car. Among the nearly 6000 working people involved in the survey, it was considered that the cost of car owners during the carpool process was reasonable and mutually beneficial, accounting for 91%.
with a free ride, commuting is much cheaper than before. As for all the things that we all approve of, as a transportation authority, it is best not to be rude and direct. Beijing allows private car carpool to take the ride. In fact, it is also a kind of carpool, which should not be simply judged as.Amp; lsquo black car.Amp; rsquo. Mr. Zhang said that since he got a ride, he had hardly ever taken a taxi.
to pay whether the fare is illegal operation, Mr. Zhang has his own view. The law recognizes the justice of the beneficiaries to pay the necessary costs to the beneficiary, as the taxi driver returns the lost items, and the passengers who ask for the mistake can be readily accepted, and why the passengers can not pay for the ride.
expert opinion
the government should clear the price standard
the premise of illegal operation must be operational, and the vehicle is not operational. The owners of car owners have the right job to take people in the process of commuting. This kind of occasional behavior belongs to the nature of mutual help, not business behavior. Yesterday, the industry experts told reporters that the government encouraged the citizens to take a carpool trip, but the management of the carpool was relatively vague, so many black car drivers were mixed into it, so the regulatory authorities would strike hard.
but he also said that the government should introduce relevant laws and regulations and management system as soon as possible. For example, carpool price management, although the "opinion" requires a reasonable cost sharing, but if only sharing the cost, it is estimated that many owners are not willing to join with strangers. If a higher cost is allowed, but how much is reasonable?