>! - M -->http://www.thepaper.cn/newsDetail_forward_2063288
moving out of the housing house, farmers will not buy it? In a deep poverty county, such a thing happens. In the county, the farmers are planning to concentrate their residential communities. From the effect map, the layout of the buildings is neat, the cultural square, the shops, the activities room and other facilities are complete. The cadres say that a few poor villages can be placed in a district to lead the poor to live in the city.
workers are laying tiles on the newly built houses on the relief and settlement point of the easy relocation of the village of Huang Jia River in Xuanen County, Enshi, Hubei province. The visual Chinese data
to understand a lot of farmers' opinions: some people do account, dismantling a local house to live in a building, to make up a lot of money, to back a famine, and more difficult in the future. Some people worry that eating vegetables, eating grain and eating water in the village does not cost money. Some people also worry about moving into the building. They want to cultivate more than ten miles away.
despite the reluctance of many farmers, the government is enthusiastic about promoting the project. One cadre said frankly that now the land use index can be transferred to the province, and the surplus of the poverty-stricken county is one mu of land. It is a few million yuan to replace the developed area. However, to stare at the rural areas, the government will replace the wishes of the farmers, the community has built up, the industry, the public service can not keep up, even if the poor households have gone upstairs, there is no living, no income, lack of development ability, and the stability and poverty alleviation, and even the return of poverty.
it is noteworthy that this is not a case. In the past few years, the phenomenon of "farmers being upstairs" and "village merging" appeared in developed areas, which are being staged in some poverty-stricken areas. It is a good policy to support the development of the poverty-stricken areas, and the reason for the reason is the blind achievement of political achievements and the overlook of the long-term development of the poor. The poverty alleviation work is not good, the basic work is not solid, the policy measures are not in place, the use of funds is not standard, and the poor people can not live a good day, and the quality of the poverty reduction will be discounted.
at present, poverty alleviation is a hard battle. There are about 120 poverty-stricken counties with more than 18% poverty incidence in the country, and 29 thousand and 800 poverty-stricken villages with the incidence of poverty over 20%. The poor population in these areas is more complicated and more difficult to get rid of poverty. The harder it is to change from "win" to "good", the more the time is tight and the task is heavy, the more we need to work hard on the quality of poverty reduction, the sustainability of the poverty reduction is the hard index. Poverty eradication is practical and the process of poverty eradication is solid.
poverty alleviation must be organically combined with rural revitalization. Poverty alleviation is not the process of demise the countryside. The village has its own law of development. Even if the urbanization rate reaches 70% in the future, there are still hundreds of millions of peasants living in the countryside. Helping poor villages does not necessarily mean that the whole village should be relocated or set up in a new way, nor is it a mere pursuit of villages and cities. There are thousands of villages in the countryside, some of them are in culture, some are special in ecology, some are special in industry, and can not be built in a uniform manner. We should respect the characteristics of the countryside and follow the law of development, and integrate the peasants' life and the rural customs, so that the countryside can see the mountain, see the water, and remember the homesickness.
should respect the wishes of the farmers. If farmers want to move or move to another place, they should let farmers have the final say. The government should sort out the diversified needs of farmers. Scientific planning and guidance should not only focus on land conservation, but also provide better public services and improve the quality of life of farmers. In order to have industrial support and make farmers have stable and lasting employment, the government gives policy support to land use, financial award and tax relief, and develops rural leisure tourism, such as farmhouse music, folk farm, and so on, and expands the function of agricultural income increase to allow farmers to live at home. To improve the old-age and medical security and other public services, not only in the form of changes in the lifestyle of rural residents, but also to improve the well-being of the poor people's happiness index, to live a good day.
run more to the village, listen to the voices of the poor, and run into the "mud leg", and can find the "golden point", so that the effect of poverty relief can be truly recognized by the masses, can stand up to practice and historical test.